George Soros, The Ideal Globalist

(This is a video presentation of the following analysis.)

I have a bunch of notes on George Soros that I gathered doing research in preparation for a radio appearance on 94.9 FM with Lori-Hopkins Cavanaugh, a discussion which I recently uploaded to this channel.  In the conversation with Lori we weren't really able to discuss Soros as much as I would have like to so I figured I'd make a video highlighting some of the incredible facts involving this intriguing character.

I called this video George Soros, The Ideal Globalist because Soros seems to epitomize the image that many infer when they use the term "globalist" in a negative connotation.  A one world government pushing, population control advocating, convicted criminal billionaire investor looking to impose his vision for the world on the world.  Some would call it a "new world order", and Soros even wrote a short book called "Toward a New World Order".

Let us quickly go over some of his globalist past.

Soros was convicted of insider trading in France in 2002, as well as fined millions in his native country of Hungary for market rigging in 2009.  Also in Hungary, in 2015, Soros was accused by the prime minister and other government officials of promoting a liberal immigration policy, funding groups to protest against the governments decisions on immigration.  Hungary is not the only country where Soros promotes an increase in immigration, he funds many groups, including in the United States, that advocate a more open border immigration policy.

Continuing on, Soros was accused by the Malaysian Prime Minister of causing the collapse of Malaysia's economy, and he was branded in Thailand as an "economic war criminal" who "sucks the blood from the people."

Soros uses his money to influence politics throughout the world, and in many cases, help overthrow governments, as was the case in Yugoslavia in 2000, Georgia in 2003, or most recently in Ukraine.

The Soros formula for overthrowing governments usually involves funding groups to take to the streets in protest, with claims that the current administration is illegitimate.  The constant protests and street demonstrations begin to have a devastating political, as well as financial effect on the state.  All the while Soros is funding journalists to publish propaganda that continues to sow unrest.  Finally, when the administration collapses, there will be a Soros-funded politician(s), being marketed as a potential new leader.  These tactics of destabilization is what caused the country of Russia to issue a ban on George Soros' Open Society Institute.

Understanding this Soros regime change formula is important as there are Soros funded groups in operation in America today that are causing an increasing number of disturbances.  As I discussed in my video about the George Soros connection to the protest in New Haven where groups of people shut down a roadway, some of the groups causing violence at the anti-Milo protest in Berkeley, California were also connected to George Soros money.  The large anti-Trump women's march that took place the day after Trump's inauguration had many financial connections to George Soros.  Black Lives Matter has been taking part in street demonstrations in the wake of President Trump being elected, and they are yet another organization with George Soros financial connections.

The point is that it seems as if George Soros could be attempting his regime change formula here in the United States.  He does not appear to be too happy that Trump was elected.  We have to keep in mind that Soros spent $5 million to help get President Obama elected in 2008 and nearly $11 million trying to get Hillary Clinton elected in 2016.  Soros was apparently heavily involved with and connected to the Clinton campaign as revealed in campaign e-mails released by Wikileaks where a top Clinton aide revealed a goal "to make Soros happy".  Soros was actually mentioned nearly 60 times in the Clinton campaign e-mails released by Wikileaks, including instructions given by Soros to Clinton when she was Secretary of State in 2011, on how to handle the unrest in Albania.  Needless to say, he wasn't thrilled that Clinton lost the Presidential election.

On the presidency of Donald Trump, Soros has called him "an imposter" and a "would-be dictator" saying Trump "is going to fail".  Therefore it is not beyond the realm of possibility that Soros may be trying to cause chaos here in America in an effort to undermine or even cause the collapse of the Trump administration.

One interesting thing about George Soros that I have never heard discussed before I looked into him was his connection to the language Esperanto.  Esperanto is a language created in the late 19th century by a Polish Jew named L. L. Zamenhof with an aim of creating an international language that all translations would be made into alone.  Zamenhof had a vision that "all nations would be united in a common brotherhood".  The father of George Soros, Tivadar Soros, was a Hungarian Jewish lawyer that was fluent in Esperanto, even founding an Esperanto literary magazine.  Tivadar taught his son George the Esperanto language.  Surely an interesting lesson in globalism at an early age.  While this international language doesn't seem like it caught on, according to Wikipedia there are up to 2 million people in the world that speak Esperanto in varying degrees, it was recognized by UNESCO in 1954, which recommended in 1985 that international non-governmental organizations use Esperanto, and apparently is still used today by the Chinese government and the Vatican.

It doesn't get more globalist than a global language.

As an interesting sidenote, in his work Mein Kampf, Hitler mentioned Esperanto as an example of a language that would be used by an International Jewish Conspiracy once they achieved world domination.

Finally, regular viewers of Connecting The Agenda are aware of the global warming scam and how that is connected to the plan for world government.  As you may have guessed, Soros is a big promoter of this concept that everyday human activity is causing devastating, irreversible damage to the planet.  Soros has given millions of dollars to Al Gore to promote global warming, and believes fighting global warming will be the main driver of a new economy.

Soros also met secretly in 2009 with other global warming, new world order advocates like David Rockefeller, Bill Gates, and Ted Turner, for a meeting in New York to reportedly talk about population reduction.

While I do not plan to follow the everyday activities of George Soros and his various foundations, I do plan on pointing out when I come across the Soros connection in my research as his globalist agenda is obviously quite similar to the Rockefeller - UN agenda that I usually write about.

Related Story:

• What They Didn't Tell You About The Protests In New Haven, Connecticut - February 9, 2017 (link)

Examining A Questionable Big Pharma Influence in Connecticut Law and Politics

Exploring the individuals, and individual entities, that are really behind the actions taken by government, whether local, state, federal, or global, is a constant theme here at TheGoodmanChronicle.com, and one such organization that will continue to come up, when researching events taking place in Connecticut, as well as across the country, is the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF).

The RWJF is one of the largest private foundations in the country, with a stated goal to "improve the health and health care of all Americans."  Important to note, as we trace the RWJF's involvement in Connecticut legislative policy, is that the RWJF was established with a bequest of shares of Johnson & Johnson (J&J) from its late chief executive, Robert Wood Johnson.  Johnson & Johnson is one of the world's largest pharmaceutical companies.  This connection is important because many legislative actions, and programs, supported, and funded, by the RWJF, would seemingly benefit the pharmaceutical industry.  Let us explore some of these programs, and legislation, supported by the RWJF, in the state of Connecticut.

In March 2014, I published an article titled Forced Mental Health Assessments Being Proposed For All Children In Connecticut, which discussed legislation that was being presented in the state legislature of Connecticut, which would have required "each pupil enrolled in public school at grades 6, 8, 10 and 12 and each home-schooled child at ages 12, 14 and 17 to have a confidential behavioral health assessment."  This legislation was lobbied for by the president of the board of directors for the CT Association of School
Based Health Centers, JoAnn Eaccarino.  The CT Association of School Based Health Centers receives funding and support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

There is also a program in operation in Connecticut, that has received millions of dollars from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, called "Child First", which is an "evidence-based model that uses home visits and a network of community services to prevent the devastating effects of early childhood adversity."  The founder of Child First, Darcy Lowell, regularly submits testimony to the state legislature, usually in favor of legislation that would use the state to increase the number of children being examined for "mental health".

In a presentation to the state Commission on Children, Lowell discussed the Child First program, where she listed situations that her organization deems "environmental risks" to children.  The list includes obvious risks to children, such as physical abuse, and lack of food, but it also includes questionable risks such as "single parenthood", and "unemployment".  The DCF, or Department of Children and Families, is listed as the leading agency of the Child First program.

The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation connection to these type of programs should be scrutinized.  It is important to understand how these home-visitation programs and behavioral mental health assessments can be used to increase the number of children on pharmaceutical drugs, thus profiting big pharmaceutical companies like Johnson & Johnson.  Former veteran Congressman Dr. Ron Paul, in 2011, was speaking out against this push for mandatory health screenings, calling it "a persistent lobbying effort, funded by pharmaceutical companies, to increase the number of these (drug) prescriptions to even more children."  If you are thinking that you have nothing to worry about, because neither you, or your children, have a mental illness, keep in mind that the list of mental disorders is ever-growing, and includes illness' such as "Oppositional Defiant Disorder", which you can be labeled with for "disagreeing with someone in a position of authority".  Also, some studies, like the one put out by the Children’s Services Working Group, suggest that the number of people that have a mental illness, many of whom unknowingly, may be as high as 20%, in a state like Connecticut.

Go To Work and Give The Government Your Children: The Feminist UN Agenda 21 Plan To "Empower" Women

The original intention in writing this analysis was simply to discover the reason that the role of women seemed to be such a vital part of United Nations Agenda 21.  As one connection led to another, I found myself with a massive amount of information, all of which important, and necessary, to explain what is happening in terms of the manipulation of women in today's society.  This is my attempt to condense all of that information into a reasonably short overview.  The reader should understand that there is much more to this story, and can follow any of the many links, and sources, provided in this analysis, if they want to learn more.

Upon my first complete reading of United Nations Agenda 21, the UN's plan for the world for the 21 century,  I noticed how nearly every chapter of the Agenda curiously emphasized the necessary role of women in the implementation of the plan.  Of course, implying that women play a major role in society is not, in itself, odd in any way, however the manner in which these ideas are presented, I did find questionable.  Aside from recommending governments implement strategies to increase the amount of women in positions of "decision makers, planners, managers, scientists and technical advisers", the agenda also wants to have influence in people's lives at home by looking to "promote the reduction of the heavy workload of women and girl children at home", and, somehow, influence "the sharing of household tasks by men and women on an equal basis."  Reducing the number of children that women have was another concept continuously discussed as a matter of importance in the Agenda.  (Sidenote:  For more information on the actual Agenda 21 document, I highly recommend reading my article A Critical Analysis of Agenda 21 - United Nations Program of Action)

At first, I just kept the Agenda's emphasis on women as a mental note, as there were seemingly more important aspects of Agenda 21 to discuss, and analyze.  However, as I began to read more UN books, and documents, an anti-men/pro-women agenda seemed to emerge.  For example, in the children's version of Agenda 21, Rescue Mission: Planet Earth , a book promoted by the United Nations, former executive of the United Nations Population Fund, Dr. Nafis Sadik, is asked the question "There's a lot in Agenda 21 about women playing a critical role in population, but aren't men usually the problem?", and her response was:

"Yes - there's a lot of male authority but not much male responsibility in relation to child bearing.  Men are not burdened with the problem of giving birth, they tend to exploit children -sending them to work instead of investing in their education. What can children do? They should challenge their parents not to have any more children until they can look after them properly." [emphasis added]

Aside from the blatant, and in my opinion, unjustified, attack on men, the idea that children are being exploited by their family reminded me of a quote from the Communist Manifesto:

"Do you charge us with wanting to stop the exploitation of children by their parents?  To this crime we plead guilty" - The Communist Manifesto 

These type of quotes, and concepts, compelled me to re-examine Agenda 21, and find a possible origin to these ideas.  The full Agenda 21 document, in book form, is 351 pages, however Agenda 21 is much more complex than just what is written in this action plan, due to the fact that there are numerous other resolutions referenced, and recommended, for further implementation.  One such resolution that is recommended for implementation is the Nairobi Forward-looking Strategies for the Advancement of Women report.  When I decided to look into, and read, this report from Nairobi, I discovered a feminist agenda, with dubious objectives.  (For a greater understanding of the objectives discussed in the Nairobi report, read my article A Critical Summary of the Nairobi Forward-looking Strategies for the Advancement of Women)

In the following examination, I will be making connections with this Agenda 21-related report, and current events that are taking place, as well as the people, and organizations, causing these events to take place.

The Citizens of Nazi Germany "Thought They Were Free": A Brief Review and Analysis of Milton Mayer's Classic Book

Nazi Germany, under Hitler, has become accepted, in modern times, justified or not, as the epitome of an evil, tyrannical government.  Growing up we would all hear, in America at least, about the terrible things the Nazis did to the Jews, and others.  Thank God, we all thought, or learned to think, that America came in and saved the "good people" during World War 2, or else Hitler would have taken over the world, and we would all be speaking German right now, those of us who would have survived anyway!  Older, and aware of propaganda, I now realize that wars are often atrocious on ALL sides, and usually arise off of the basis of "old men lying", and lead to "young men dying", as the old expression notes.  With that said, there does seem to have been an extreme brutality carried out by the Nazi regime, on their enemies.  The images of starving human beings in a Nazi concentration camp, or the videos of whole families being shot in a pit, ready for immediate burial, can be haunting.  One question that would always come to my mind, when hearing, or seeing, stories like this, is, what could make these people so evil, and how could a whole country full of people support a government like this?

They Thought They Were Free by Milton Mayer attempts to answer the question of how and why 'decent men' became Nazis (National Socialists).  Published in 1955, Mayer interviews ten former Nazis, in Germany, after the fall of Hitler's regime, in an attempt to understand what their mind state was before, during, and after National Socialism, and try to comprehend how they could let the evil that took place, happen. 

The ultimate conclusion seems to be that everything happened in such small steps, and with the right amount of propaganda, that nobody really seemed to notice the big change that was occurring in their society.

In the beginning, after a spark of antisemitism began to kindle in Germany, Jews began getting rounded up for their own "protection", and nobody seemed to really care, or notice.  A newspaper titled Kronenberger Zeitung, published an article dated November 11, 1938, at the bottom of page four, under a very small headline reading "Protective Custody", which stated:

"In the interest of their own security, a number of male Jews were taken into custody yesterday.  This morning they were sent away from the city."

Mayer had shown this newspaper article to each one of the ten former Nazis that he was interviewing, and not one of them recall hearing about this event, or anything like it.

This level of ignorance by the citizens, in important affairs that are taking place, in their society, is unnerving, but should not come as a surprise to anyone, at least anyone living in America.  The vast majority of Americans could not tell of specific violations of human rights that are being carried out by their own government, of which there are many.  Most Americans, I would think, do not even know that the current President of the United States, Barack Obama, has assassinated American citizens.  When you are not looking for the truth in government affairs, or of anything, for that matter, you will not find it.

It is important to note that many people became Nazis, not because they generally agreed with the principles of National Socialism, but it was a way of getting ahead in German society, to be a part of "the party".  If you were German, you didn't necessarily have to become a Nazi, but by not doing so, you accepted that you would never get promoted in your job, and lose out on other privileges.

When Mayer pressed his interviewees on why they didn't do more to stop the atrocities, they would ask, "What would you do?".  Touche.  Mayer understands the complexity of the situation, and chronicles, excellently, in the book, how it would be difficult for one person to know what was really going on, never the less do something about it.

At the time of this book's publishing (1955), the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) was a fairly new organization in America, and Mayer makes a frightening comparison:

"The Federal Bureau of Investigation, with its fantastically rapid development of a central record of an ever increasing number of Americans, law-abiding and lawless, is something new in America.  But it is very old in Germany, and it had nothing to do with National Socialism except to make it easier for the Nazi government to locate and trace the whole life-history of any and every German."

Other interesting topics discussed in They Thought They Were Free:

• Even the fire fighters became militarized, and became branches of the SA, or police departments.  They became "fire-fighting police"!
• People eventually didn't feel comfortable discussing politics in Germany.
• Overtime, Nazi Sunday-morning services began to replace the church.

There is obviously much more discussed in the actual book, and of course, at a greater depth.  The only critique I have of the book is that Mayer, at times, gives his opinion of certain things, that I do not entirely agree with.  Also, in small instances throughout the book Mayer seems to indicate that he is some sort of secret government agent, operating in Germany.  One such passage caught my attention, when referring to the ten former Nazis that he was interviewing, Mayer states:

"I did lie to all ten of them on two points: on the advice of my German colleagues and friends, I did not tell them that I was a Jew; nor did I tell them that I had access to other sources of information about them than my private conversations with them." [emphasis added]

Mayer never does elaborate on what his "other sources of information" were, which leaves this topic open for speculation.

I do not pretend to be an expert on Nazi Germany, therefore I can't get into a debate on how accurate a picture this book paints of the times, and the people.  As my knowledge of history increases, I will likely benefit from another reading of this work, understanding more of the wars, and people, mentioned throughout, though I do not think a major understanding of world history is needed to grasp the main point of this book, and highly recommend it to everyone.

Wake UP! Photos September 2013

This is a collection of photos that I have found through my daily travels of the internet, in the month of September.  I upload the latest collections every month or so.

Wake UP! Photos August - 2013

This is a collection of photos that I have found through my daily travels of the internet, in the month of August.  I upload the latest collections every month or so.

Wake UP! Photos - June 2013

This is a collection of photos that I have found through my daily travels of the internet, in the month of June.  I also include any "Know Your Reps" photos, that I create.  I upload the latest collections every month or so.

Wake UP! Photos - March 2013

Government Works With Hollywood To Brainwash You

In the most recent case of Hollywood being used to directly influence your thinking on a particular issue, a new commercial shows famous television and movie actors, like Jamie Foxx, Selena Gomez, Chris Rock, and more, saying we all need to talk to our 'leaders' and 'demand a plan' to address gun violence, which I would presume to mean gun control.  A parody of this video has been made, showing the hypocrisy of these actors. (video below)  If they think guns and gun violence is so bad, why do they play in movies that use so much of it?

 

Hollywood has been used to push political agendas before, and the use of movies and television programs, by government, to push certain views onto the viewer is NOT secret.  There have been several documentaries showing the relationship between the pentagon and Hollywood.  Many movies that now include the use of the US Military, in any fashion, need to be first approved by the U.S. Pentagon.  Some movies, like Top Gun, starring Tom Cruise, are used as a recruitment method to the military.  Here are a couple good documentaries on the subject.    

Empire : Hollywood and the war machine: "Empire examines the symbiotic relationship between the movie industry and the military-industrial complex."

Operation Hollywood: How The Pentagon Shapes And Censors The Movies - "Have your favorite movies been censored or meddled with by the Pentagon?"

The website, Hollywood Reporter, ran a story on November 11, 2012, titled "Obama's Hollywood Organizers Reveal Winning Strategy That Helped Tip Election", that covers the re-election of Obama, and how actors, musicians, celebrities, etc., were used in an elaborate strategy to influence your vote.

The propaganda is everywhere, look for it. 

While You Eat Poison, The Elite Eat Organic

I try to eat ORGANIC as much as I can.  I get criticized by friends and families with the typical statements, "it's all the same", and "your wasting your money", but I believe pesticides, chemical fertilizers, and gentically modified food is bad for you.  It appears that I am not alone.  The wealthiest and most powerful people on this planet, only eat Organic, or prefer it over any other option.  The same politicians that are passing laws, promoting the safety of scientifically altered food, are choosing to eat only Organic.  Here are a few examples, with links:

  The Romney Family

-  Mitt Romney, who actually has ties back to the company Monsanto, reportedly makes sure his own meals are nothing but organic. Reuters Steve Holland reports from Romney's airplane, "Everything's organic, I'm told, including the ingredients to Romney's favorite, peanut butter and honey sandwiches."  Ann Romney even credits a combination of organic foods and holistic medicine for turning her health around after she was diagnosed with multiple sclerosis in 1998.

A Final Look At Election Fraud and Manipulation for 2012

Well Obama has officially been re-elected.  As I have been covering, election fraud and voter manipulation is a tactic used by both Democrats and Republicans.  This years election proved to be no different.  Here I will list the various interesting stories revolving around this years elections, and attribute them to what I believe to be either a Democratic operation, or a Republican operation.

Democrats 

-  NAACP Takes Over Polling Location in Houston, TX.

-  North Carolina resident Jimmy Green claimed his mentally disabled step-daughter, along with other patients of this institution, were coerced into registering to vote, and into voting for Obama.

-  Black Panthers patrolling polling stations in Philadelphia, PA.

-  Wendell Justin Williamson, a resident of a North Carolina mental institute, who a judge ruled was not guilty of killing of two people by reason of insanity, was registered on September 13th, and cast an absentee ballot on October 15th.

-  Bookies back Obama to defeat Romney.

-  Various reports of electronic voting machines changing Romney votes to Obama.


Republicans

-  Business associates of Mitt Romney are linked to a company that distributes voting machines throughout the country.

-  In Clackamas County, Oregon, election workers are under investigation for tampering with ballots.  Sources familiar with the incident say their understanding is that a woman filled in a straight Republican ticket on the ballots where preferences had been left blank by voters.

-  Several major companies, including Georgia-Pacific and Cintas, have sent letters or information packets to their employees suggesting — and sometimes explicitly recommending — how they should vote this fall.  In these letters, the executives complain about the costs of overregulation, the health care overhaul and possible tax increases. Some letters warn that if President Obama is re-elected, the company could be harmed, potentially jeopardizing jobs.

I am just one person, and cannot catch every news story that comes out, so I would assume that this was just a small portion of the real picture of election manipulation that had taken place.  I imagine that election fraud had always taken place, to some degree, but with our electronic voting machines, and extreme lack of accountability, it seems it is a lot easier to do today.  There are many changes that need to take place to our voting process, and I hope we begin soon. 

Will President Obama Receive The Same Back Lash Over His Response To Hurricane Sandy Victims, That President Bush Received After Hurricane Katrina ?

In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina in 2005, many people criticized, and rightly so, President Bush for the federal response to the victims who were homeless, wet, and hungry.  One heavy influencing critic was hip-hop mogul Jay-Z.  In 2006, Jay-Z released a song called "Minority Report", where he discusses his feelings towards the Hurricane Katrina situation and President Bush's response.  Lyrics to this song include

"Helicopter swooped down just to get a scoop 

Through his telescopic lens but he didn't scoop you 

The next five days, no help ensued 

They called you a refugee because you seek refuge 

The commander-in-chief just flew by 

Did he stop? No, he had a couple seats...

"I just put my monies in the hands of the same people that left my people stranded

Nothin' but a bandit

Left them folks abandoned"

Flash forward to 2012, Barack Obama is President, and Jay-Z brags that he is "a small part of the reason" that Obama was elected.  Jay also boasts "I got the mayor, on my pager".  So I wonder what his response is going to be now that Hurricane Sandy has hit him hometown of Brooklyn, and everyone from the mayor of New York, to the President of the United States is receiving hostile criticism about the relief effort, or lack there of.

A Staten Island resident confronted Senator Chuck Schumer, pleading for help from Obama, begging the Senator not to leave, and screaming "We Are Gonna Die!".

In the video above, taken by NBC, a Coney Island resident talks about the dire situation in her community, including residents having no food, no heat, and no water.  Another Coney Island resident says people are defecating in the hallways in her building.  They are all furious at the government response, and the uselessness of FEMA. 

Of course, in the bigger picture of things, it doesn't matter what Jay-Z has to say, there is a crisis occurring. 

I believe what we can learn from this situation, is to not trust in anyone for your safety and protection, especially the government.  Every year the federal government steals vast amounts of money from the people, and fund ever-expanding, useless programs like FEMA, which are supposedly set up, specifically, to be prepared for disasters, but have a terrible track record.  Imagine the audacity of FEMA telling people to prepare for the Hurricane, yet they weren't prepared for it, and they have an enormous budget ! If that money was left to the states, they could create their own disaster relief crews, which would be more reliable, accountable, and cheaper because you wouldn't have to pay some federal bureaucrats to do anything.  

This is also an example of how quickly things can turn bad.  The vast majority of us are NOT self-sufficient.  We don't grow our own food, or raise cattle.  We don't know where or how to get clean water, if it stops coming out of the pipes.  And even if you do know how to be self-sufficient, your neighbors still aren't, and that could still lead to a major problem. 

My advice: Don't be scared, just be prepared, for the worst. 

What If Trayvon Had Died In A Drone Strike ?

The Young Turks (TYT) has done an interesting piece on the hypocrocy of Obama, drone strikes, and Trayvon Martin.  Check it out.