Children are the future; the course of humanity is ultimately dependent on what the little human beings of the world are taught today. The United Nations understands this, and this is why they publish materials attempting to influence the attitudes, and beliefs, of children, often presenting only one side of an argument, with a goal of having these children's beliefs, and attitudes, be more aligned with the future goals of the United Nations. This is called propaganda, and the children's book, promoted by the UN, Rescue Mission: Planet Earth: A children's edition of Agenda 21, published in 1994, is definitely propaganda. (Side note: To view a scanned .pdf version of this book, in full, click here.)
According to the book's introduction, the purpose of publishing Rescue Mission was to condense the massive United Nations plan for the 21st century, "Agenda 21", "into a language that ordinary people can understand." (pg 7) A critical thinker, at this point, may ask, why was not the original plan written in a language that ordinary people can understand? I have took the time to read, and analyze, the original plan, Agenda 21, and my guess as to why it was not written in a language that ordinary people can understand is, the average person may more easily come to the same conclusion that I came to, that Agenda 21 is a plan, by the United Nations, to gain more decision making power, or sovereignty, from countries, and create a world in which every resource, water, animals, food, etc., even human resources, and population size, is tracked, collectivized, and controlled by a group of non-elected bureaucrats at the UN, working in conjunction with big corporations, and non-governmental organizations (NGO's).
Interesting to note, also in the introduction of Rescue Mission, there is an opening quote by the former General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, and former leader of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev, about needing to "save the planet from destruction." The fact that Gorbachev is a communist, and openly being promoted in UN literature, should not come as a surprise, as the United Nations is an organization with a collectivist philosophy, as well as having many specific connections to Communism. In an effort not to stray away from this specific critique of Rescue Mission, I will not detail the history of the United Nations, and their connection with communists/collectivism, in this examination, but intend to do so in the future.
Among the many controversial ideas discussed, or maybe, pushed through propaganda, is a better way to put it, in Rescue Mission, are:
Humans are bad for, and ruining, the Earth.
There is an urgent need to reduce population, including through abortions.
A lowering of the standard of living is required for inhabitants of first world countries.
A world government is needed to fix the problems of the globe.
( A poster advertising a demonstration in Andover Town Hall in support of a Mrs. Blanchard on her release from imprisonment for refusing to allow her children to be vaccinated (date unknown). (Photo courtesy of MicroBiology Today).
I was under the false impression that controversy over vaccinations was a new phenomena, however as I was reading a biography on Thomas Jefferson, titled "A Strange Case of Mistaken Identity" by Alf Mapp Jr., I came across a passage concerning Thomas Jefferson receiving the smallpox inoculation, and the controversy surrounding this medical procedure, at the time:
"Fatalities were so numerous that doctors debated whether the disease or the supposed preventative was the greater menace...it was generally believed that inoculated persons spread smallpox to others...Inoculation was forbidden by law in New York and had excited mob action in Boston."
Even before vaccinations, it was common knowledge that survivors of smallpox became immune to the disease, so doctors were practicing a procedure called variolation, which is when a person was purposefully infected with smallpox (Variola), in a controlled manner, so as to minimize the severity of the infection, and also to induce immunity against further infection. This procedure came under heavy criticism.
The origins of the practice of variolation, or inoculation, are hard to trace, however, we know that under the guidance of Rev. Cotton Mather, and Dr. Zabdiel Boylston, variolation became quite popular in the American colonies. Mather went around advocating the need for immediate variolation, however, he persuaded only Dr. Boylston, and not many others. Still, with Mather's support, Dr. Boylston immediately started a variolation program and inoculated many volunteers, despite much opposition in both the public and the medical community in Boston. As the disease spread, so did the controversy around Mather and Boylston. At the height of the epidemic, some in opposition to the variolation procedure were urging the authorities to arrest Dr. Boylston for murder, and a grenade was even thrown into the house of Reverend Cotton Mather!
According to Thomas Jefferson biographer, Alf J. Mapp, Jr.:
"On the eve of the [American] Revolution, debate over the practice [of variolation] would further exacerbate differences between Norfolk's rebels and tories. At the climax rebels would smash the windows of a tory mayor's residence and march the inoculated women and children of his family to the Pest House, last home of those suffering contagious terminal illnesses."
Edward Jenner
Then came a physician/scientist named Edward Jenner. For many years, Jenner had heard the tales that dairymaids, which are women who work milking cows, making butter, and cheese, on a farm, were protected from smallpox naturally, after having suffered from cowpox. Using this information, Jenner concluded that cowpox not only protected against smallpox, but also could be transmitted from one person to another as a deliberate mechanism of protection. On May 14, 1796, using matter from the cowpox lesions of a dairymaid, he inoculated an 8-year-old boy, James Phipps. Afterward, the boy developed mild fever, and discomfort in the axillae, or armpit. Nine days after the procedure he felt cold and had lost his appetite, but on the next day he was much better. Jenner inoculated the boy again, this time with matter from a fresh smallpox lesion. No disease developed, and Jenner concluded that protection was complete.
The Latin word for cow is vacca, and cowpox is vaccinia; Jenner decided to call this new procedure vaccination.
The President of Danbury Nurses' Union, Mary Consoli, was testifying last week, at a state Public Health Committee public hearing, in opposition to a bill that would force vaccinate all health care workers in the state, when Connecticut State Representative Peter Tercyak went on a patronizing rant directed towards Consoli, and anyone else that is against forced medication, that included his belief that "maybe we've been to generous with allowing parents to claim a religious exemption", in regards to children who enter public schools without receiving the 'required' immunizations.
The five-minute exchange between Consoli and Tercyak, began at about 14 hours and 17 minutes into an extremely lengthy fifteen hour public hearing, which can be viewed, in it's entirety, here. (Sidenote: If anyone reading this has any information, or instructions, in regards to how I would be able to record and capture a good quality short video clip of this exchange, from this fifteen hour stream, please e-mail me: TheGoodmanChronicle@gmail.com)
It is worth reading, hearing, and viewing, more of what Representative Peter Tercyak had to say during this exchange. When Mary Consoli replied "No, what I'm saying is", in an attempt to correct Representative Tercyak for misrepresenting her beliefs, Rep Tercyak arrogantly cut her off and began:
"What your saying is you don't think people should have to take flu shots..."
When Mary Consoli was able to reply, she reminded the Representative that children are allowed a religious waiver to enter school without immunizations. Rep Tercyak then snobbishly replied:
"Yes, and now we see many of the disease we thought we eradicated, coming back, and it will be interesting to see how many children...how many parents have to stay up all night worrying about their children dy...*correcting himself*...their childrens effects from whooping cough, before we decide maybe we've been too generous with allowing parents to claim a religious exemption"
Rep Tercyak eventually realized he was being a douche-bag (to say it best), and he began apologizing to Mary Consoli, after, again, condescendingly cutting her off:
"Ok I'm very sorry mam. I'm very sorry for going on like this. You came to testify and you did. I thank you very much. You didn't come to be interrogated by me. Excuse me thank you. Thank you very much for you indulgence madame chair, next time I try this, you can slap me."
Representative Tercyak seems to embody the control-freak, pyschopath mentality that I have come to loathe in politicians. The comment, 'maybe WE'VE been too generous', gets me angry. It is implying that Representative Tercyak believes that he, being a part of the 'we' (the elite, the lords, the royalty) is being generous in allowing the peasants (us) to decide what goes into their bodies.
Also, Rep. Tercyak seems to believe that there is an increase in whooping cough cases, as a result of parents who have chosen not to vaccinate their children. The evidence does not support his belief. One study done by Dr. David Witt, an infectious disease specialist at Kaiser Permanente Medical Center in San Rafael, California, expected to see a rise in whooping cough among unvaccinated children, but actually ended up showing that whooping cough outbreaks are HIGHER among vaccinated children compared with unvaccinated children. From the report:
"We started dissecting the data. What was very surprising was the majority of cases were in fully vaccinated children. That's what started catching our attention," said Dr. David Witt.
Of the 132 patients with whooping cough, under age 18, 81 percent were up to date on recommended whooping cough shots and eight percent had never been vaccinated. The other 11 percent had received at least one shot, but not the complete series.
Manufacturing the whooping cough vaccine seems to be a great business; the vaccine causes more whooping cough, yet doctors continue recommending the vaccine to prevent whooping cough. A never ending cycle of profit!
I am sure the medical "experts" will have some way to combat, and twist, this information to recommend that we should have MORE vaccines, as a result. That is why instead of a scientific argument against forced medication, my argument is for liberty; LEAVE ME ALONE.
If you believe in the effectiveness of vaccines, then YOU get them, but leave me alone. If you think my unvaccinated child is a threat to your child, in public school, then YOU send your child to some special school, either that, or, give me my tax money back, that went into the public school, so I can have the resources to home school my child. We have the right to decide what goes into our bodies, not the government.
CT State Representative Peter Tercyak Pushing Forced Medication pt 1 (video)
CT State Representative Peter Tercyak Pushing Forced Medication pt 2 (video)
Related Stories:
Connecticut: Registered Nurses Speak Out Against New Bill That Would Force Vaccinate All Health Care Workers In The State - March 21, 2013 (link)
Know Your Reps! CT State Senator Joe Markley Wants Fluoride Out Of The Water, and A Ban On Mandatory Flu Shots - March 07, 2013 (link)
President Obama's 23 Executive Actions; Federal Spy Doctors, Forced Medication & Involuntary Commitment - January 21, 2013 (link)
TV Doctors Are Paid To Push Drugs and Vaccines - January 16, 2013 (link)
Legislators Pushing Forced Medication In Wake of CT School Shooting - December 22, 2012 (link)
Newtown, CT School Shooting: Medication, Tragedy, Truth, & Conspiracy - December 18, 2012 (link)
A bill introduced by the state's Public Health Committee would require all employees of the health-care field, to receive a flu shot.
Quoting from the actual bill, Senate Bill 1128, AN ACT CONCERNING INFLUENZA IMMUNIZATIONS FOR HEALTH CARE EMPLOYEES:
"Each hospital...nursing home facility...and emergency medical service organization...shall ensure that each employee of such hosptial, nursing home facility, or emergency medical organization, who may have direct contact with a patient or resident, is immunized against influenza."
Several registered nurses submitted compelling testimony in opposition to this bill, Senate Bill 1128. Here are some excerpts of those testimonies:
John Brady, a Registered Nurse at Backus Hospital in Norwich, submitted testimony in opposition to this bill. Brady, who is also President of the Backus Federation of Nurses, a union representing approximately 400 registered nurses, writes about the adverse effects of vaccinations, as well as the ineffectiveness of the shots. "As an emergency room nurse, I care for many patients who have received the flu vaccine and then tested positive for the flu."
Mary Consoli RN, President of Danbury Nurses’ Union, representing 600 plus nurses, also gave testimony in opposition to SB 1128, quoting OSHA, which believes "there is insufficient scientific evidence for the federal government to promote mandatory influenza vaccination programs that do not have an option for the health care employees to decline for medical, religious and/or personal philosophical reasons.” Consoli also related a personal story to the possible health risks associated with vaccinations. "We had one RN at Danbury Hospital have a severe allergic reaction. If it were not for the fact she was working in the Emergency Department, the consequences could have been more life threatening."
Jeanette Schultz, Registered Nurse, testifying in opposition to this bill, says "within 4 days of obtaining the flu shot, I noticed increased sensitivity and tingling in my hands and feet. It lasted approximately four days and then resolved. Since then I haven’t received the flu shot." Last year, Schultz decided to choose the other option provided to her by her employer, to wear a surgical mask, however after twelve hour shifts, Schultz had complications to her throat, as a result of the mask.
Registered Nurse Tracey Rullo, who has gone over twenty years without ever receiving a flu shot, or being sick from the flu, spoke on the vaccines ineffectiveness. "Many, if not, all of our patients admitted with the flu did have the flu vaccine."
A nurse employed at Danbury Hospital, Michele Lopez, discussed how she was forced to take the flu shot, because the other option her employer provided her, to wear a surgical mask, after four weeks, caused her to have an upper airway and esophageal reaction. After receiving the shot, Lopez said she felt "violated as a human being", and several hours later, she noticed her arm swelling, itching, and breaking out in hives. Lopez was then admitted into the emergency room as a patient.
Erin Cummings, who has been a Registered Nurse for 8 years, believes this bill is a violation of his civil rights, and described his adverse reaction, after being forced vaccinated by his employer. "Shortly after being injected, I experienced the frightening sensation of not being able to take a deep breath, and severe heart palpitations resulting in dizziness and vertigo."
To read the entire list of testimonies concerning Senate Bill 1128, click here.
Dr. Steven Aronin
One person who gave testimony in support of this bill, to force immunize nearly all health care workers in the state, was Steven I. Aronin, Chief of Infectious Diseases at Waterbury Hospital. Aronin explained that he knows "first-hand the potentially devastating and debilitating impact that influenza and other infectious diseases can have on patients". Aronin claims there "is abundant peer reviewed and evidence-based research supporting" the idea that forced vaccination of healthcare workers is correlated with decreased transmission and acquisition of influenza, though he did not provide any actual research, or study.
Steven Aronin boasts that Waterbury Hospital was able to administer over 2000 flu shots this year and achieve 100% compliance among clinical and non-clinical staff, though Aronin falsely credits this 100% compliance rate with the hospital "educating our employees about influenza, as well as the risk and benefits of the influenza vaccine". Aronin must have forgot to point out the fact that these immunizations were FORCED, and there were hospital employees who protested, but were threatened with their jobs.
Also left out of his testimony, Aronin never gives any evidence indicating that the 100% FORCED compliance immunization rate in Waterbury Hospital, worked. I know people who work at this hospital, who were involved in this debate, and they say there were several employees still sick with the flu, after being forced immunized, which again proves the ineffectiveness of the vaccination.
Another bill introduced this year in the Connecticut legislature looks to do the complete opposite of this bill. Senate Bill 55, introduced by Senator Joe Markley, would prohibit employers from requiring employees to receive mandatory flu shots. Let us hope that Senate Bill 55, gets more support than Senate Bill 1128.
I don't work in the medical field, however I know that I have to stick up for the rights of the people who do, because this attempt to force vaccinate everyone will continue to expand, until it is destroyed. I believe in the idea of liberty, and that includes a free-market, where a private business can set requirements for their employees, including mandatory vaccinations, and if an employee doesn't like it, they can leave and work somewhere else. HOWEVER, hospitals, as well as public schools, receive government funding, therefore they are public entities, and cannot violate our natural inalienable rights, as a condition to our receiving services from, or working for, these organizations.
Related Stories:
Connecticut Business Owners Could Soon Face $500 Fine For Not Having Paper Towels In Restroom - March 11, 2013 (link)
Know Your Reps! CT State Senator Joe Markley Wants Fluoride Out Of The Water, and A Ban On Mandatory Flu Shots - March 07, 2013 (link)
President Obama's 23 Executive Actions; Federal Spy Doctors, Forced Medication & Involuntary Commitment - January 21, 2013 (link)
TV Doctors Are Paid To Push Drugs and Vaccines - January 16, 2013 (link)
Legislators Pushing Forced Medication In Wake of CT School Shooting - December 22, 2012 (link)
Newtown, CT School Shooting: Medication, Tragedy, Truth, & Conspiracy - December 18, 2012 (link)
Doc McStuffins is an animated series, on the Disney Channel, about a six-year-old girl who communicates with, and heals, stuffed animals and toys in her backyard clinic. The show was created under the consultancy of the Hollywood Health & Society, which is a federally-funded organization, through which "public health and medical experts offer expert consultation, education and resources for writers, and producers, who develop scripts with health storylines and information."
Television can be an extremely effective tool to push a certain message, to a mass amount of people. In the past, I have written about how Hollywood is used, to push the agenda of the military industrial complex, as well as the agenda of Big Pharma, in particular vaccinations.
This particular organization, Hollywood, Health, & Society, works with over 800 writers, and has helped shape over 300 television shows, in the past two years. In the Hollywood Propaganda section of my previous article, TV Doctors Are Paid To Push Drugs and Vaccines, I have more information on Hollywood, Health, & Society.
I wouldn't want to get into a debate about whether vaccinations are good, or whether a cartoon that gets children comfortable with going to the doctor is helpful, when discussing this issue. I just don't believe tax money should be used to influence writers, and producers, in Hollywood. We have people in America who worry about not being able to eat, after their food stamps gets delayed by one day, but yet we are comfortable enough to pay this group to influence Hollywood ? (Not too mention the money spent on military bases all over the world, the drones, the tanks, foreign aid, etc.)
I just think it's creepy to know that the government is covertly funding a Disney cartoon that sings songs about "Do What The Doctor Says" (video above), and has their agent at the Hollywood, Health, & Society, Sandra de Castro Buffington, consulting with the show to get them teaching kids about getting shots.
Studies show two-thirds of regular television viewers learn about health from TV dramas. Big pharmaceutical companies know this, and team up with Hollywood, to push their medical agenda, and prescription drugs. Daytime television is filled with advertisements, and commercials, for all types of prescription drugs, but the fairly recent trend of glorifying certain doctor/actors, as medical experts, is being exploited and manipulated by Big Pharma, to further push their agenda.
We should question why these doctors wear their white lab coats and hospital scrubs when they are on stage, performing for television, as if they were just backstage performing medical procedures.
David Drew Pinsky, best known as Dr. Drew, has become one of the most famous doctor/television personalities, with a popular syndicated radio show, as well as starring roles in, and producing, a number of television shows.
What you may not know is that Dr. Drew was involved in the largest health care fraud case in U.S. history. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, the worlds fourth-largest pharmaceutical company, was forced to pay $3 billion and plead guilty to promoting two popular drugs for unapproved uses, failing to disclose important safety information on a third drug, as well as a number of other complaints. The company was even paying kickbacks to doctors to prescribe those drugs, as well as others. According to U.S. attorney Carmin Ortiz, the sales force of GSK "bribed physicians to prescribe GSK products using every imaginable form of high priced entertainment, from Hawaiian vacations to paying doctors millions of dollars to go on speaking tours to a European pheasant hunt to tickets to Madonna concerts, and this is just to name a few."
