(Editors Note: This summary is meant to act as supplemental reading to the main article Go To Work and Give The Government Your Children: The Feminist UN Agenda 21 Plan To "Empower" Women, an analysis that must be read to understand how the ideas conveyed in the Nairobi conference are being implemented throughout the world.)
In the year 1985, the United Nations held a World Conference on Women, in Nairobi, Kenya, the purpose of which, according to the UN, was to set "strategic objectives and actions for the advancement of women and the achievement of gender equality". This specific meeting in Nairobi was just one of several conferences, and meetings, that have been sponsored by the United Nations, aimed at the promotion of these gender based ideals. The meetings, and the objectives that were reached, in Nairobi, in '85, were the culmination of the previous conferences, and discussions, held on the subject, and served as a foundation to future meetings.
In an attempt to keep this summary focused, only the agenda, and objectives, specifically mentioned at the Nairobi conference will be discussed. (To view the full text of the Nairobi report, click here.) However, readers should understand that this conference, along with the objectives discussed, are part of the much larger UN action plan for 21st century, Agenda 21. The Nairobi conference is recommended for implementation in Chapter 24, Section 2, part a, of the Agenda 21 document, which can be viewed in it's entirety here. If you are unfamiliar with the United Nations Agenda 21 plan to control every resource in the world, including humans, I highly recommend reading the analysis, A Critical Analysis of Agenda 21 - United Nations Program of Action.
Children are the future; the course of humanity is ultimately dependent on what the little human beings of the world are taught today. The United Nations understands this, and this is why they publish materials attempting to influence the attitudes, and beliefs, of children, often presenting only one side of an argument, with a goal of having these children's beliefs, and attitudes, be more aligned with the future goals of the United Nations. This is called propaganda, and the children's book, promoted by the UN, Rescue Mission: Planet Earth: A children's edition of Agenda 21, published in 1994, is definitely propaganda. (Side note: To view a scanned .pdf version of this book, in full, click here.)
According to the book's introduction, the purpose of publishing Rescue Mission was to condense the massive United Nations plan for the 21st century, "Agenda 21", "into a language that ordinary people can understand." (pg 7) A critical thinker, at this point, may ask, why was not the original plan written in a language that ordinary people can understand? I have took the time to read, and analyze, the original plan, Agenda 21, and my guess as to why it was not written in a language that ordinary people can understand is, the average person may more easily come to the same conclusion that I came to, that Agenda 21 is a plan, by the United Nations, to gain more decision making power, or sovereignty, from countries, and create a world in which every resource, water, animals, food, etc., even human resources, and population size, is tracked, collectivized, and controlled by a group of non-elected bureaucrats at the UN, working in conjunction with big corporations, and non-governmental organizations (NGO's).
Interesting to note, also in the introduction of Rescue Mission, there is an opening quote by the former General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, and former leader of the Soviet Union, Mikhail Gorbachev, about needing to "save the planet from destruction." The fact that Gorbachev is a communist, and openly being promoted in UN literature, should not come as a surprise, as the United Nations is an organization with a collectivist philosophy, as well as having many specific connections to Communism. In an effort not to stray away from this specific critique of Rescue Mission, I will not detail the history of the United Nations, and their connection with communists/collectivism, in this examination, but intend to do so in the future.
Among the many controversial ideas discussed, or maybe, pushed through propaganda, is a better way to put it, in Rescue Mission, are:
Humans are bad for, and ruining, the Earth.
There is an urgent need to reduce population, including through abortions.
A lowering of the standard of living is required for inhabitants of first world countries.
A world government is needed to fix the problems of the globe.
This is a random collection of ten documentaries, with my description of each. These ten films happen to be centered around Hitler, Nazi Germany, WWII, etc. I post a different documentary, every time I watch a new one. To prevent my documentary page from taking an extremely long time to load, I create separate pages for older documentaries. This is page 5. Mein Kampf - The Story of Adolf Hitler(added 01/23/14) This is a quick, 45-minute, documentary on the rise of Adolf Hitler, before he ultimately became Germany's leader. This film tries to explain the reason for Hitler's views and the situation in Germany that allowed the rise of Hitler. Incredible footage of post-WWI Germany is shown, where the allies are disarming the German population, destroying weapons, blowing up German submarines, and helicopters. Footage of French troops in Germany, disrespecting its citizens is also shown. Interestingly, clothing designer Hugo Boss is discussed, in relation to his being a Nazi party member, and him designing many of the Nazi uniforms.
The United Nations wants to give your children "rights". You may think your child already has "rights", but the kind of "rights" that the UN wants to legally provide children are the kind that would bring a government agent to your house if you decide to home school your children, bring them to a religious function, or even punish them. This agent would decide if your actions are, or were, appropriate, and in line with the child's "rights".
The plan to give all of the children of the world the same "rights", is known as the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child (UNCRC, or CRC). It is important to understand that this plan is actually part of a much larger United Nations plan called "Agenda 21." I have previously written on Agenda 21, and found the document to be a plan by the United Nations to gain more decision making power, or sovereignty, from countries, and create a world in which every resource, water, animals, food, etc., even human resources, and population size, is tracked, and controlled, by a group of non-elected bureaucrats at the UN, working in conjunction with big corporations, and non-governmental organizations (NGO's). In Article 25, Section 14 of Agenda 21, governments are required to ratify the Convention on the Rights of the Child.
In this analysis, I will detail a brief history of "child rights", explore the actual text of this document, the effect this convention has had on countries that have ratified it, and trace its attempted ratification in the United States, down to our own Connecticut state legislature.
History of the CRC Decades before the UN held a convention on the rights of the child, there were various declarations made, in regards to giving children special rights, even dating back as far as 1924, adopted by the predecessor of the United Nations, the League of Nations. In 1989, The UN General Assembly adopted the Convention and opened it for signature. It came into force in 1990, after it was ratified by the required number of nations.
In the United States, under the administration of Bill Clinton, the CRC was signed, but the treaty was never submitted for Senate approval, due to opposition from some members of the Senate. More recently, in 2009, the Obama administration revived efforts to have the United States sign onto the CRC, according to former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, Susan Rice. The following year, thirty-one Republican senators cosponsored a resolution opposing the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child. The United States is only one of a few countries yet to ratify the treaty.
Let us examine the actual text of the treaty. This "Convention on the Rights of the Child" treaty is 15 pages, consisting of 54 Articles, detailing the assertion that children have special rights, and the ways to implement the bureaucracy that is needed to insure that governments are "protecting" these children's rights.
When dealing with the United Nations, as with any government organization, it is important to critically examine the grammar used, see past the happy, positive sounding rhetoric, and be able to understand the actual details of a plan. The CRC opens with a preamble that emphasizes the importance of "the protection and harmonious development of the child". Again, this sounds nice, but we must remember, this could mean anything, and is coming from an organization that calls their violent military army, "peace keeping" troops.
The Disney-owned cartoon series "Marvel Super Hero Squad" is helping to indoctrinate your children into the belief that the earth is warming to dangerous levels, and human beings, and their carbon output, are the reason for this potential catastrophic rise in temperature.
In Season 1, episode 22, titled "The Ice Melt Cometh" (video clip above), a character named Flat man, portrayed as a monotone idiot, is hosting a "conference on global warming". Flat man has an assistant, Reptil, who is condescendingly introduced by Flat man as not being a "super genius, like me". After showing a ridiculous looking graphic of the sun getting hotter, consequently heating up the earth, Flat man gets interrupted by his assistant Reptil, "Wait, Flat man. Global warming is about greenhouse gasses, you know pollution that comes from our cars and factories." Flat man responds, "your entitled to your opinion, but you're wrong."
Later on in the episode (4:40 into the video clip), Flat man is submerged in water, and says "OK Global warming is bad, but won't get any worse." Finally, at the end of the episode, according to one viewer (I have not been able to find, and view, the FULL episode), Flat Man is dripping wet from the polar ice caps melting and he says, "global warming doesn't exist, did I also mention the earth is flat?"
The overall message of the cartoon seems to be confusing, probably purposefully, but the propaganda is obviously there.
Interesting to note, according to Wikipedia, Flatman is gay.
The reference to the earth being flat, in relation to global warming, is another thought-provoking connection. Last month, President Obama angrily blasted climate change skeptics during his energy policy speech at Georgetown University, saying he lacked “patience for anyone who denies that this problem is real.”
“We don’t have time for a meeting of the flat-Earth society,” Obama said. “Sticking your head in the sand might make you feel safer, but it’s not going to protect you from the coming storm.”
Ironically, Salon.com has reported that there really is a flat-earth society, and they actually are with the President in his belief in man-made global warming!
Comic Book Propaganda
Marvel comics has a long history of using their brand to push political propaganda. Recently, in issue #583 of The Amazing Spider-Man, released in 2008, Spider-Man teamed up with President Obama to stop the Chameleon.
Also, in 1971, Marvel Comics then editor-in-chief, Stan Lee, wrote a three-part Spider-Man story portraying drug use as dangerous, and unglamorous, after getting approached by the United States government, asking him to do so.
A quick Google search of something like "comic book propaganda", will lead you to some interesting pictures, and give you an insight to just how long propaganda has been pushed through these channels.
Doc McStuffins is an animated series, on the Disney Channel, about a six-year-old girl who communicates with, and heals, stuffed animals and toys in her backyard clinic. The show was created under the consultancy of the Hollywood Health & Society, which is a federally-funded organization, through which "public health and medical experts offer expert consultation, education and resources for writers, and producers, who develop scripts with health storylines and information."
Television can be an extremely effective tool to push a certain message, to a mass amount of people. In the past, I have written about how Hollywood is used, to push the agenda of the military industrial complex, as well as the agenda of Big Pharma, in particular vaccinations.
This particular organization, Hollywood, Health, & Society, works with over 800 writers, and has helped shape over 300 television shows, in the past two years. In the Hollywood Propaganda section of my previous article, TV Doctors Are Paid To Push Drugs and Vaccines, I have more information on Hollywood, Health, & Society.
I wouldn't want to get into a debate about whether vaccinations are good, or whether a cartoon that gets children comfortable with going to the doctor is helpful, when discussing this issue. I just don't believe tax money should be used to influence writers, and producers, in Hollywood. We have people in America who worry about not being able to eat, after their food stamps gets delayed by one day, but yet we are comfortable enough to pay this group to influence Hollywood ? (Not too mention the money spent on military bases all over the world, the drones, the tanks, foreign aid, etc.)
I just think it's creepy to know that the government is covertly funding a Disney cartoon that sings songs about "Do What The Doctor Says" (video above), and has their agent at the Hollywood, Health, & Society, Sandra de Castro Buffington, consulting with the show to get them teaching kids about getting shots.
(America's 2nd Revolutionary War - documentary by VICE)
I have seen several interesting documentaries by the filmmakers at VICE. They have a cool, entertaining way of presenting their information, which is why, I believe, they are popular today. While I do not deny that you can learn some interesting facts or details about a topic, when presented by VICE, I am always skeptical about where an operations funding comes from, and if there is an agenda that is not being openly presented.
The filmmakers of VICE get flown all over the planet, but at whose expense? I could not find any reports of direct funding, so I can not make any claims or speculations regarding the specific financial backers of the operation. What we do know is that SOMEONE is funding VICE, and, inevitably, that person(s) has SOME agenda, as everyone does. (Sidenote: The agenda of The Goodman Chronicle is to find truth, and promote liberty.)
What first made me skeptical about the truth in the reporting of VICE, was a documentary they made titled "How to sell drugs". (video below) The description to this video reads like this:
"Ever wonder how to sell $100,000 worth of drugs in a week? We learned the secrets of a drug dealer in NYC - a man who will deliver any substance you want, 24/7. He told us everything - from where he gets his drugs to how his crew operates. Come with us as we take a rare look into the dangerous life of a NYC drug delivery-man."
As I watched this video, I kept thinking to myself, 'this is bullshit'. Everything about the video seemed to be made up. The 'drug dealers' in the video all seemed to act, and talk, like cops, probably under cover NYC drug detectives. The 'drugs', and drug transactions, they were showing did not seem to justify the claim of making $100,000 a week. And besides, if someone is making that kind of profit, and running a large scale operation to that extent, why would they risk it all, to let a documentary film company, who may be working with the police, or one day be able to provide police with information, follow him? It just didn't make sense to me.
I didn't give VICE much further thought, until this month, when they released a documentary titled "America's 2nd Revolutionary War." (video at top of page) I am now convinced VICE has some hidden agendas in their reporting. I know a great deal of information on the topics discussed in this particular documentary, and in "America's 2nd Revolutionary War", I can see obvious one sided reporting, as well as an attempt to portray organizations like Oath Keepers, and individuals like radio talk show host Alex Jones in a negative light, using distasteful tactics.
The documentary opens up with a clip from the Alex Jones radio show, where Alex is discussing the fraud of the two-party political system, class war, tyranny, etc. Throughout this documentary, VICE is showing backstage video, which I assume they shot, of The Alex Jones Show, and only playing clips from Alex Jones's radio show. What is strange to me is that they never once showed any footage of them, interviewing Alex Jones. If they flew down to Texas, and went to his studio, I would assume they would have asked him some questions for the documentary they are making, right?
Ryan Duffy, of Vice, then sets the tone for the rest of this documentary with his opening statement on the current feelings of Americans, after the election of Barack Obama in 2008, "There was this growing movement of people who really feared the government and rejected this idea of hope all together."
The documentary then proceeds to do a soft 'hit piece' on the "liberty movement." Instead of interviewing people who are well established and have credibility, VICE interviews people like an elderly gentleman who was protesting for the first time in his life, as well as an overweight, middle aged white woman, who they never name, smoking a cigarette on the sidewalk, holding an American flag, on a rant about the country 'going down the tubes' and saying how we need to 'stop Obama and Pelosi or else "we're going to be in a civil war in a very short time." They then cut to her screaming on the sidewalk, with some elderly woman sitting down holding a sign, that you can't read, shouting "Deport Illegals" and "No bail out for Mexico".
One of the main people that VICE chose to focus on in this documentary was Sgt. Charles Dyer, USMC. Dyer had a Youtube channel, and would wear a scary mask when broadcasting. Dyer seemed to be fairly level-headed, but admittedly was very new to the resistance movement and was only awake 'with the situation' for about a year, when VICE decided to follow him. If you looked for recent headlines involving Dyer, you would find that, in 2011, he was arrested in Texas after becoming a fugitive, on the run for allegedly raping a six year old girl.
Throughout this documentary words like "The New World Order" and "Global Government" are used, but never once does VICE try to look into what "the new world order" means, or if there really is a "global government" being set up. They could have at least played the infamous George Bush speech, when he called for a 'New World Order'. But they did nothing! After watching this documentary, the ignorant masses will assume these terms to be associated with the 'weirdos' that are shown in this documentary.
Former New York Times journalist Chris Hedges, seems to be brought into the documentary as the 'voice of reason.' Chris Hedges attempts to brush away any conspiracy talk, by explaining, "Conspiracy theories become a way to explain the chaos of a world people don't understand. What conspiracy theorists don't grasp is that the elite is also inept. And conspiracy theorists frighten me because they can't read reality any more than people who naively believe that a corrupt elite is going to bring back the salad days of casino capitalism, can read reality."
I can keep going on with the dubious film making tactics that were used for propaganda purposes throughout this documentary, and there are many more that you can find yourself, but you get the point. Though, there is a final example I want to use to show the tastelessness, and potential hidden agenda, of the producers at VICE. I watched the whole documentary, with closed captions on, and everything matched word for word throughout the entire film, except for one part. At 23:14 in, Alex Jones says "We are going to KICK the new world order's butt", but is quoted in the captions as "we are going to LICK the new world order's butt." Coincidence?
I don't believe VICE is a bad organization. They make entertaining, and sometimes informative, films. I am just giving my opinion on what I have been noticing about the things I have been seeing, coming from VICE.
Also, last November, Shane Smith, co-founder of Vice, was on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast. He was talking about the need for alternative energy, and the threat from global warming/climate change, but when Joe Rogan asked him about Nikola Tesla, Shane Smith claimed to never have heard of him. I am not saying you need to know about Tesla, to be an expert on alternative energy, but I thought someone in Shame Smith's position would know about Tesla's experiments.
Studies show two-thirds of regular television viewers learn about health from TV dramas. Big pharmaceutical companies know this, and team up with Hollywood, to push their medical agenda, and prescription drugs. Daytime television is filled with advertisements, and commercials, for all types of prescription drugs, but the fairly recent trend of glorifying certain doctor/actors, as medical experts, is being exploited and manipulated by Big Pharma, to further push their agenda.
We should question why these doctors wear their white lab coats and hospital scrubs when they are on stage, performing for television, as if they were just backstage performing medical procedures.
David Drew Pinsky, best known as Dr. Drew, has become one of the most famous doctor/television personalities, with a popular syndicated radio show, as well as starring roles in, and producing, a number of television shows.
What you may not know is that Dr. Drew was involved in the largest health care fraud case in U.S. history. GlaxoSmithKline LLC, the worlds fourth-largest pharmaceutical company, was forced to pay $3 billion and plead guilty to promoting two popular drugs for unapproved uses, failing to disclose important safety information on a third drug, as well as a number of other complaints. The company was even paying kickbacks to doctors to prescribe those drugs, as well as others. According to U.S. attorney Carmin Ortiz, the sales force of GSK "bribed physicians to prescribe GSK products using every imaginable form of high priced entertainment, from Hawaiian vacations to paying doctors millions of dollars to go on speaking tours to a European pheasant hunt to tickets to Madonna concerts, and this is just to name a few."
In the most recent case of Hollywood being used to directly influence your thinking on a particular issue, a new commercial shows famous television and movie actors, like Jamie Foxx, Selena Gomez, Chris Rock, and more, saying we all need to talk to our 'leaders' and 'demand a plan' to address gun violence, which I would presume to mean gun control. A parody of this video has been made, showing the hypocrisy of these actors. (video below) If they think guns and gun violence is so bad, why do they play in movies that use so much of it?
Hollywood has been used to push political agendas before, and the use of movies and television programs, by government, to push certain views onto the viewer is NOT secret. There have been several documentaries showing the relationship between the pentagon and Hollywood. Many movies that now include the use of the US Military, in any fashion, need to be first approved by the U.S. Pentagon. Some movies, like Top Gun, starring Tom Cruise, are used as a recruitment method to the military. Here are a couple good documentaries on the subject.
Empire : Hollywood and the war machine: "Empire examines the symbiotic relationship between the movie industry and the military-industrial complex."
Operation Hollywood: How The Pentagon Shapes And Censors The Movies - "Have your favorite movies been censored or meddled with by the Pentagon?"
In the year 1985, the United Nations held a World Conference on Women, in Nairobi, Kenya, the purpose of which, according to the UN, was to set "strategic objectives and actions for the advancement of women and the achievement of gender equality". This specific meeting in Nairobi was just one of several conferences, and meetings, that have been sponsored by the United Nations, aimed at the promotion of these gender based ideals. The meetings, and the objectives that were reached, in Nairobi, in '85, were the culmination of the previous conferences, and discussions, held on the subject, and served as a foundation to future meetings.
